Answer:
I. Lack of a proper pension system
II. Corruption
III. Lack of interest.
Explanation:
I. Lack of a proper pension system: Some countries especially in the developing countries have no proper pension system which makes them not to put good attention to pension accounting
II. Corruption: This is one of the main reasons why pension accounting is given less accounting in many countries of the world, as some leaders usually wants to create room to loot the funds of the pensioners.
III. Lack of adequate interest: Some countries of the world give less focus and emphasis on the plights of pensioners which makes them not to put good effort to their issues or pension accounting.
Answer:
The price of the item in long run equilibrium will be the same i.e $ 2 per unit
Explanation:
Given
The equilibrium price in the long run = $ 2 per unit
The price of the item in long run equilibrium will be the same i.e $ 2 per unit
The increase of price in short run will not have much impact on the Average variable cost and hence in long run the price will remain constant.
Answer: $868
Explanation:
Given the following :
Maturity (years) - - - - - - 1 - - 2 - - - 3 - - - 4
Spot rate (EAR) - - - - 1.4% - 2.8% - 3.6% - - 4.5%
What is the price of a risk-free zero-coupon bond with 3 years to maturity and a face value of $1,000 (in $)?
Face value / ( 1 + spot rate)^p+1
Where P = year
=1000/(1+3.6%)^4
1000 / ( 1 + 0.036)^4
1000/(1.036)^4
1000/1.151964303616
=$868.08245
Answer:
$255,000
Explanation:
Given that,
2016:
Taxable and pretax financial income = $850,000
Tax rate = 30%
2017:
Taxable and pretax financial income = $850,000
Tax rate = 35%
Income tax refund receivable in 2018:
= Taxable and pretax financial loss in 2018 × Tax rate in the year 2016
= $850,000 × 30 percent
= $255,000
Note:
(i) The carry back provision allows losses to be carried back to preceding 2 years, with the amount of net loss being applied to earliest year first.
(ii) 2018 net loss should be applied to income of 2016 first.
Cost-benefit principle would state that you would only take an action if the benefit outweighs the cost.
For example: It may cost me $5 to drive to work, but I make $50 for showing up, I would go because the benefit I get outweighs the cost and I am better off going than staying at home.
