Answer:
1. FIRST BATTLE OF THE MARNE
At the start of the First World War, Germany hoped to avoid fighting on two fronts by knocking out France before turning to Russia, France’s ally. The initial German offensive had some early success, but there were not enough reinforcements immediately available to sustain momentum. The French and British launched a counter-offensive at the Marne (6-10 September 1914) and after several days of bitter fighting the Germans retreated.
Germany’s failure to defeat the French and the British at the Marne also had important strategic implications. The Russians had mobilised more quickly than the Germans had anticipated and launched their first offensive within two weeks of the war’s outbreak. The Battle of Tannenberg in August 1914 ended in German victory, but the combination of German victory in the east and defeat in the west meant the war would not be quick, but protracted and extended across several fronts.
The Battle of the Marne also marked the end of mobile warfare on the Western Front. Following their retreat, the Germans re-engaged Allied forces on the Aisne, where fighting began to stagnate into trench warfare.
The opening months of the war caused profound shock due to the huge casualties caused by modern weapons. Losses on all fronts for the year 1914 topped five million, with a million men killed. This was a scale of violence unknown in any previous war. The terrible casualties sustained in open warfare meant that soldiers on all fronts had begun to protect themselves by digging trenches, which would dominate the Western Front until 1918.
Explanation:
The answer is c, religious tolerance. I hoped I helped.
Answer:
If I lived in a economy in which production, investment, prices, and incomes are determined centrally by a government it would change my life in a lot of different ways. The first way it would be different is I would be paid differently. That could have drastic consequences on my income and investments. I also might not be able to find all the commodities or goods that you would normally be able to find in a market economy. If for some reason I wanted to buy some luxury items: fancy bed, new expensive clothes and such then the state would say no because those items are not needed to survive. Therefore my life would be different in that way. all in all living in this kind of economy would become very different then my current lifestyle
Explanation:
For the other answerer if you highlight the previous answer with the mouse and then right click it the press copy you can paste it on here using ctrl v
Thaddeus Stevens in the house and Charles sumner in the senate
