The correct answer is <span>what is written in the Constitution is not open to interpretation
Strict constructionism is a way of interpreting the constitution. Constructionists only accept what is written and the way in which it was written. There is nothing beyond what is written and from his point of view, if it says that all people are equal and citizens of the United States then all people indeed, including African-Americans. For him, there is no interpretation that looks at deeper meaning, what is written is what is intended and that's why he is a strict constructionist. </span>
Answer:
The question above is a moral one.
In order to achieve a balance, we must become aware that the Author and Consitution that measures morality puts everyone on the same level.
That is, if one person lies, they are no different morally from one who steals.
This realisation that there is 'right' and 'wrong' and that there is one that administers over everyone to check the latter, helps with conviction and checks one from being too quick to be others to judgement.
It's key to note that the good book makes it clear that a servant rises or falls before his Master and that with the same measure that one person judges another, shall he or she be judged.
Man at the best will always be imperfect. There are three stages of imperfection:
- Imperfect but getting worse
- Imperfect but just in-between
- Imperfect but getting better consistently
Cheers
