Considering how large of a GDP the US have, I would agree with such a move. There's several reasons why I would agree on such a move. One of them is of course the well being of the nature, as it is crucial for the survival of every living organism, including the humans. Reforestation will bring in lot of benefits that will gradually return the investment. For starters, the air quality will improve, and by doing so, the health problems among the people will reduce significantly, thus much less will be spent on healthcare. Part of the new forests can be fruit forests, which will be an enormous reserve of organic food without having to use any labor or effort in production. Also, by establishing forests, whole ecosystems will get back on the scene, so lot of useful plants can be harvested from the forests, such as herbs and mushrooms. If the US makes a deal so that it can use certain part of the benefits from the forests until it gets its enormous investment, it will be a win-win situation for everyone. In order to have the budget for the global reforestation, it would be the best to cut down on the budget for development of weapon of mass destruction and the budget for war.
So that the Egyptian temple of Abu Simbel was not flooded
Answer:
subside
Explanation:
Isostasy is a geographical term which describes the condition of gravitational equilibrium that exists within the Earth's crust and mantle, there by, making the crust stays above a heights that relies on its physical attributes, such as thickness and density.
In Isostasy, its occurrence process involves principles of buoyancy in which an Earth crust apply stress on the less stronger mantle, such that for over a geological time moves laterally in a way that the load is contained by height adjustments.
Hence, Isostasy would suggest that the area at the mountain front, where the thrust emerges, should SUBSIDE over time.
The main goal of the British invasion of India was the wealth that they were going to get through trade. The British had already developed the industry, so they were able to create final goods very quickly, efficiently, and cheaply. By having India under their control, the British were able to take the natural resources and raw materials for free or for very low prices, manufacture them, and then sell them in India or other places for much higher prices. This type of trade led to accumulation of lot of wealth by the British. They were getting the natural resources and materials for almost nothing, and then they were selling the products in the places from where they took away the natural resources and raw materials. This led to loss of natural resources and raw materials for little to no compensation, while also paying for the final products, so India, as many other colonies was very negatively impacted by this way of trade.
