Explanation:
it could be either. it depends on how you want to interpret it. going strictly by the grammar (because of the Can), it would be interrogative. but going by the intended meaning, it could be seen as imperative (a nicely worded order). are you looking at syntax or semantics?
Answer:
What happened ? What did these events mean to the main character?
Answer:
Jem had to go back for his pants because the lie Dill told to Atticus didn't involve his pants being destroyed, only lost. He said he had lost them in "strip poker." Jem couldn't argue with that lie and come up with a better one where the pants were actually destroyed or else he would risk exposing the lie, so he had to go along with it.
If he hadn't come up with the pants relatively soon, Atticus would have punished him for losing them permanently, a punishment Jem seemed eager to avoid when he said he had not been "whipped" for a long time and he didn't want it to happen again. He clearly has a healthy respect for Atticus and is also afraid of the whip, as he should be. Atticus would have either punished him for losing the pants (something it would cost money to replace) or have punished him for lying, had he found out how the pants were really lost.
So, Jem really had no choice but to go back for his pants, as scary as that prospect was.
Explanation:
Answer:
In the definition of psychology, what does the term mental processes refers to? ... Professor Wenches approaches questions about human behavior from a ... unconscious dynamics within the individual, such as inner forces or conflicts. It is most likely that she accepts which of the following psychological approaches?
Explanation:
