Answer:
Find and describe connections between the ideas that are shared.
Explanation:
The question asks you to choose the action that is “most likely to help or improve a COLLABORATIVE discussion about literature.”
Let’s look at the options.
Choice 2: Choose one person to call on people who wish to speak about the story.
• This could foster collaboration, but it could also give one student too much power and in the process, take away the voices of others.
Choice 3: Argue with each person who shares a perspective on the story.
• Arguing brings about hostility rather than collaboration.
Choice 4: Give each person exactly one minute to speak before letting someone else talk.
• This could foster collaboration by giving people equal opportunities to talk, but such rigid guide lines could also limit the freedom and flow of a discussion.
That leaves us with the first choice, which makes the most sense and has no negative side to it.
Answer : C
Explanation: i had this assignment the other day. Passed with a 90
Third person limited is the narrator only knows the thoughts and feelings of one character - narrator is not a part of the story - uses “they”, “he”, “she.” Third person omniscient is point of view where the narrator knows all the thoughts, feelings, and intentions of all characters - “all knowing” “voice of god”
It’s the writers are in complete agreement
The correct answer is B) factual way.
Both the video transcript from "Dr. X and the Quest for Food Safety" and the text Food Safety Myths Exposed present information in a factual way.
"Dr. X and the Quest for Food Safety" is an instructional video that teaches the importance of clean and healthy food. Indeed is a series of five videos about the science of our food supply. The topics that are factually covered by the videos are different kinds of bacteria, the Farms, processing and transportation of food, the food at retail and home, and outbreak and future technology.