I believe the answer is A
Answer:
parol evidence
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the admission of Brogan's testimony is most likely governed by the parol evidence rule. This rule created to prevent a party from introducing evidence before the agreement was made final in order to change the existing contract. Which is what Brogan is doing in this scenario by trying to release evidence about his age before the finalization of the contract.
Answer:
Autonomous morality
Explanation:
Piaget suggests two types of moral thinking:
<u>Heterogeneous morality:</u> This morality occurs at the age of 5 to 9 years. This morality is imposed on the children from outside sources like their parents will impose morality on children. The children obey morality as the rules and regulations of others that can not b change.
<u>Autonomous morality:</u> This morality occurs between the age of 9 to 10. It is also called moral relativism. In this morality, children think about there no right or wrong and morality is based on intentions, not on consequences. Moral understanding under this age going for fundamental reorganization.
