Answer:
Safavid Dynasty believed in one God and considered Muhammad was the successor of God whereas the other Islamic regions believed in one God. The Safavid Empire was reinforced by significant Shi'a warriors from the Ottoman armed force who had fled from miSafavid Dynasty was the milestone no heir
Explanation:
Answer: For centuries, America’s borders were up for grabs.
European nations staked claims on paper while tribes claimed the ground itself, but the border remained a work in progress, an imaginary line, until troops clashed and treaties settled the question.
In 1849, after the Mexican-American War, the United States sent teams of surveyors, soldiers and laborers to mark this new line in the desert, which sounded simple but proved difficult. The teams struggled as the Southwest seethed with conflict.
A line had been drawn, but the border was far from settled.
Explanation:
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "<span>the calculated use of power adherence to international law " </span>Germany and Italy became unified under a policy of Realpolitik, a german expression that means that the goals of the government policy should be accomplished by <span>the calculated use of power adherence to international law </span>
Darius had two most important tasks when he ascended the throne of Achaemenid Empire. He had to conquer the rebellious areas and to integrate them into a systematic empire. The empire is notable for its successful Centralized, Bureaucratic administration. Darius, however, ruled the empire with the help of his provincial Governors who overlooked the territory. Therefore he connected these regional government to the center with the help of the postal system. The success of this empire lies in the fact that the ruler had the ability to recognize and utilize the already established governments. Therefore it can be said that the Administrative system of the Achaemenid was based on the previously existed Akkhadian, Assyrian and Egyptian system of administration.
Answer:
The first caricature is criticizing the ideology of socialism because it depicts Karl Marx, one of the intellectual founders of that system, as the guiding force that is leading his followers, the socialists, to the abyss.
The second caricature criticizes liberalism. Liberalism is associated with the free market (classical liberalism and libertarian liberalism), and such system has a tendency to facilitate the accumulation of wealth, and the growth of economic inequality. That is why the second caricature is depicting a fat individual surrounded by bags of money.
