Answer:Icarus experienced joy and exhilaration. He was "beating his wings in joy" and felt "the thrill of the cool wind on his face". He was "bewitched by a sense of freedom". Meanwhile, Daedalus was "crazed by anxiety".
Explanation:
Answer: 23¹/₄
23 and 1 over 4
Explanation: Use PEMDAS OR BODMAS to calculate
(3/6)² + 7 × 4 -5 Parentheses first. 3/6 is 1/2 Then Exponents
(1/2)² is ¹/₄
Then calculate Multiplication and Division
7 × 4= 28
Now we have
¹/₄ + 28 - 5 Do the Addition and Subtraction, left to right.
28 ¹/₄ - 5
23 ¹/₄
<em>It looks as if the same question is posted twice here, and a bit confusing to sort out. I am assuming the parentheses around the fraction, and that the "power of 2" is the exponent. If the "2 + 7 × 4 -5" is all in parentheses as an exponent to calculate, that would result in a different answer. </em>
<em> I hope this helps.</em>
Pls help ASAP I DONT have time Pls help ASAP I DONT have time Pls help ASAP I DONT have time Pls help ASAP I DONT have time Pls help ASAP I DONT have time Pls help ASAP I DONT have time Pls help ASAP I DONT have time Pls help ASAP I DONT have time
Answer:
Occam's razor
Explanation:
Formulated by the medieval philosopher William of Occam (sometimes spelled Ockham), Occam's Narvalha is a reductionist philosophical, problem-solving principle that distinguishes between equivalent theories and can be used as a technique for formulating theoretical models. In its simplest formulation, Occam's Razor will say that between two theories with equal results, which explain or predict the same phenomena, we must always choose the simplest theory.
Formulated by the medieval philosopher William of Occam (sometimes spelled Ockham), Occam's razor is a reductionist philosophical, problem-solving principle that distinguishes between equivalent theories and can be used as a technique for formulating theoretical models. In its simplest formulation, Occam's Razor will say that between two theories with equal results, which explain or predict the same phenomena, we must always choose the simplest theory. Based on this, we can conclude that the critical thinking that explains the alternative hypothesis shown in the question above about people with "blind vision" is Occam's razor.
