Hey There!
Anthropologist agree that people make assumptions, just by looking at people, and make racist comments.
Have A Brainly Day!
As a result of the "Corrupt Bargain" of 1824, Andrew Jackson resigned from the Senate. He founded a new political party, the Jacksonian Democrats. Beginning already in 1825, he ran a very aggressive campaign for the presidency in 1828 and won that election.
Further explanation:
In the presidential election of 1824, Andrew Jackson won the most popular votes (43%) and won the most electoral votes also. But since no one had attained a majority of electoral votes, the decision was given to the US House of Representatives, which named John Quincy Adams as president. Jackson accused Adams and Speaker of the House Henry Clay of what he called "a corrupt bargain."
Jackson resigned from the Senate in October, 1825. He was nominated by the Tennessee legislature as a candidate for the presidency. He rallied supporters around him in a new party that became known as the Democratic Party. Jackson won the election for President in 1928. It was a nasty, dirty campaign, with heavy personal attacks about the candidates being tossed around by both sides. The mudslinging campaign for the presidency in 1828 set a precedent for the sort of negative politics we've been seeing ever since.
The correct answer is Pablo Picasso.
This particular piece is named The Three Musicians, and it is one of the two similar pieces produced by Picasso in Fontainebleau near Paris in 1921. The picture represents a Harlequin, a Pierrot and a Monk and it is a good example of Synthetic Cubist style.
<u>The Hebrews became slaves in blank:</u>
The Hebrew is the term used for the ancient people who came from what now is called Israel and Palestine. The Israelites are in Egypt for a very long time but they are working as servants for the pharaoh.
But the pharaohs feared the one day the large population of Israelites would turn against and would force pharaohs to become slaves, and that is why the Hebrews became slaves in blank, means even due to their large population the pharaohs are scared but still they are working as servants and that is why the Hebrews are slaves in blank.
<span>In contrast to the sea-based empires developing in Europe, land-based empires remained the dominant political form in other parts of the eastern hemisphere. The era between 1450 and 1750 saw the appearance of several land-based empires who built their power on the use of gunpowder: the Ottomans and the Safavids in Southwest Asia, the Mughals in India, the Ming and Qing in China, and the new Russian Empire. All had huge land armies armed with guns. These empires developed relatively independently from western influence, and to some extent they counterbalanced the growth of European power and colonization.
An important consequence of the appearance of the Gunpowder Empires was their conquest of most nomadic groups. Since the nomads had less access to guns, the empires were finally able to conquer and subjugate them. In many areas direct relations among states or merchant groups replaced nomadic intermediaries for international contact. For example, European kings invited diplomats from other countries to join their courts, and China also received foreign representatives.
Muslim Empires
In the previous era, the political power of Muslim lands had been crushed by Mongol invasions in the 13th century and those of Timur, a central Asian of Mongol descent, in the 14th century. Three new empires &endash; the Ottoman, the Safavid, and the Mughal - rose between 1450 and 1750, and collectively they supported a new flowering of Islamic civilization. However, competition between them also led to important political divisions and military clashes. All three originated in the Turkic nomadic cultures of the central Asian steppe, and they all had absolute monarchs who modeled their courts on those of earlier Islamic dynasties.
Although each of the Muslim Empires had their own special problems, they faced some similar ones that eventually led to their decline.
Inadequate transportation and communication systems - Although they had the necessary military technology to control their empires, transporting it to where it was needed was another issue. The larger they grew, the more difficult it was for the infrastructure to be adequate for the task.
Unruly warrior elites and inadequate bureaucracies - The military leaders knew their importance to the state, and they often operated quite independently of the government. Even in the Ottoman Empire, where the bureaucracy was the strongest, the sultan eventually lost control of the Janissaries, who rebelled against him when their constant demands went unfulfilled.
The rise of European rivals - Ultimately, the Europeans benefited more from the gunpowder revolution than the Muslim Empires. European countries were smaller, both in population and land space, and so mobilization of their human and natural resources was easier. They were also in such strong competition with one another that the Europeans were spurred on to try new technologies and reforms.
The Ming and Early Qing Dynasties in China
The Ming Emperors continued to rule China until the mid-1600s, but the dynasty was in decline for many years before that. Although its cultural brilliance and economic achievements continued until about 1600, China had some of the same problems that the Muslim empires had: borders difficult to guard, armies expensive to maintain, and transportation and communication issues, sources:google</span>
