Answer:
Ken has used the Split - Half techniques
Explanation:
The split-half techniques is used to assess the internal consistency of a test.
it measures the extent to which all parts of the test contribute equally to what is being measured.
This is done by comparing the results of one half of a test with the results from the other half. A test can be split in half in several ways.
This method of testing reliability measures internal consistency i.e how well the test components contribute to the construct that’s being measured. It is most commonly used for multiple choice test.
In relation to the above questions the action of Ken shows that he has used the split half techniques in order to assess the reliability of the test.
Portugal based its claim to Brazil on the fact that Pedro Alvarez Cabral had landed and had been the first European to discover Brazil in 1500.
Pedro Alvarez Cabral was a Portuguese nobleman, navigator, and also a military commander.
A Joint Committee, is the answer
Answer:
Both are correct
Explanation:
It is nature-nurture controversy or debate which focuses on an individual's personal behavioral traits to be a product or result of either genetics inheritance or acquired influences.
On one side, some psychologist and other natural sciences argue that behavioral traits and characteristics of a person can be explained by genetics as nature is per- wiring.
On the other hand, other social sciences and sociologist argues that human behavior is learned and shaped through social interaction and nurture.
Thus both genetics and human interaction and environment contributes to the human behavior.
Therefore, both the views are correct.
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
It is always very important to deliver speeches that are very unique, addressing the context or the situation at that time. When the speech is being delivered using another unrelated concept created by someone else, the speaker may likely seem very insincere before the audience, and they may also not be able to understand why the speaker talks quite differently from the issue at hand. The listeners can as well lack engagement with his speech as seen in the case of Walter.
