In a capitalist economy, the role of government is extremely very restricted. The main functions of government, as given By Adam Smith, are to continue to keep going law and order in a country. Making national defense stronger, and regulate the money supply. According to Smith, the market system administers numerous economic functions.
Hello, since we are talking about Rome I assume the answer is latin.
Answer:
Americans backed President Carter's sanctions and embargoes on the Soviet Union, including boycotting the 1980 Olympics.
Explanation:
The perspective of Americans on the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan is that "Americans backed President Carter's sanctions and embargoes on the Soviet Union, including boycotting the 1980 Olympics."
Following the invasion of the Soviet Union on Afghanistan, the then United States President, Jimmy Carter, sanctions and placed embargoes on the Soviet Union, including boycotting the 1980 Olympics, many Americans supported the decision citing that the penalty exemplified commitment many Americans believe is right or justified to the cause of fighting the oppression, and anti-democratic Soviet Union's administration.
Answer:
business in which ownership is shared
when businesses agree to limit supplies of a product
Explanation:
Answer:
A. State laws can ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places
Explanation:
It is Option A. because when State laws ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places, every eligible voters or electorates will be given adequate chance and opportunity to vote whoever they believe will represent their interest without biases to another candidate or party. Hence, the right answer is Option A.
It is not option B, because when State laws prohibit political speech if it is considered controversial, that equates to suppression of FREEDOM OF SPEECH, which will eventually results to campaigns being restricted. Thus, this action by the State will not support a fair election process.
It is not Option C. because when State laws restrict voting if the government has a good reason, then some electorates will be disenfranchised, and the election result, will not show the true reflection of the people's will. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.
It is not Option D. because when State laws benefit some people and hurt others to keep an election fair, those the laws hurt, will be disenfranchised, and that will show biases from the government towards a particular candidate or party over others. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.
