Answer:
The disagreement in this sentence is misplaced modifier.
Explanation:
A modifier, as the name suggests, is a word or phrase used to modify another element mentioned in the sentence. For that reason, <u>modifiers tend to stand close to the word they refer to in order to avoid ambiguity.</u> <u>A misplaced modifier happens</u> when ambiguity is not avoided. <u>The modifier is placed incorrectly, too far from the word it refers to</u>, which makes it difficult to understand and connect the ideas.
<u>In the sentence we are analyzing here "[s]unny yet dusty" is a misplaced modifier. It makes no sense for the word "sunny" to refer to "traveler" in this context. That means this modifier refers to "destination", but is too far away from it in the structure. One way to correct it is:</u>
The traveler finally arrived at her destination, which was sunny yet dusty.
Answer:
An incident that showed authority overcoming personal conscience was the torture of Iraqi prisoners in 2004, at the hands of U.S. soldiers in the Abu Ghraib prison.
Explanation:
Even after the superiors were informed of the abuses, nothing changed, showing there was common practice for the authorities, and therefore, for the soldiers under their command.
Tough one! I would go with B; anyone can have opinions on anything, so there goes C as an answer. A and D are inherently the same and is the opposite of what debatable means.
I thin that the answer is Wei-Chen.
Answer:
That someone's opinion, some people will say yes and other say no. My opinion would be no, wishes are nice but they cant help you in life. The perfect solution to life problems is God, he's the one to go to not a wish.
I hope this helps
