Answer:
Hi. Ok, so from what I have learned about it and seen from her book is that she wishes to be more mature but when she actually is and is expected to act that way, she repeatedly writes about it and complains. Basically, this would mean that instead of following her parents wish to be mature or to act like a lady(teenager) she does the opposite and realizes what this comes with. Then she doesn't like it as much as she did before she is a teenager despite saying how much she wanted to be. As for evidence, I don't know off of my head, but know her diaries mention it several times. For the explanation, Anne explains her desire to be so much but then starts misbehaving a bit and that comes with facing her family and friends opinions which she doesn't like. Hope this helps you out as a basic explanation.
Answer:
While West and East Africa Kingdoms grew political power from the wealth provided by trade, the political relationships in Inland Africa grew out of kin-based networks where families would govern themselves.
Explanation:
The political structure in the Kingdoms of Inland Africa didn´t centralize the power under a single authority. Instead, every city-state had kin-based networks with a male chief who would mediate in social conflicts and represent his network in front of other groups.
Answer:
He believed this subject in genral was wrong
In his Notes on the State of Virginia, published in 1785, Jefferson expressed the beliefs that slavery corrupted both masters and slaves alike, supported colonization of freed slaves, promoted the idea that African-Americans were inferior in intelligence, and that emancipating large numbers of slaves.
The primary goal of the American Foreign Missionary Society was "<span>to establish missions in lands west of the Mississippi River," </span>
Option B. Judicial review
Arizona. “Before questioning, the person should be warned that they have the right to remain silent, that their statements may be used as evidence, and that they have the right to have a commissioned or appointed attorney present.
The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda's side, and the police officer told the suspect during questioning, "He has the right to remain silent and what he says will be used against him in court." There is a possibility, and he has the right to do so."
In the landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that if police do not notify the individual, they will do so with respect to certain individuals arrested in the United States. Their confessions cannot be used as evidence in court, in accordance with constitutional rights, including the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination. .
Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona at
brainly.com/question/4429252
#SPJ1
