1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gemiola [76]
3 years ago
7

Were Populists supporters of the "captains of industry" AKA "robber barons", or did they think the government should have a stro

ng hand in the economy and share the wealth?
pls help
History
1 answer:
PolarNik [594]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: The leaders of this 19th century industry are obviously "Robber Barons." In this industry, robbing people is the only way to ensure your own victory. For example, as an author I will be cut short of my deserved profits by the industry middle man. However, the idea of being a captain of industry seems to be a title with little meaning. A captain of industry is a captain of deception and robbery. I see no different in these denominations Until the day a man of industry can fairly rise to his position, titles will be created to commemorate their deceptive accomplishments. However, I do believe it is possible to accomplish this. There must be, in some way, a solution in which a man can honestly climb the proverbial ladder of industry. Each rung of this ladder can be represented as a step toward a Captain of Industry, or a Robber Baron. The day that this occurs, the American industry will become an honest an reliable system.

You might be interested in
What are the causes of many empires falling?
vampirchik [111]

War, economic instability, poverty, uprising, and outside influences.

3 0
3 years ago
A stateless nation is often subject to all of the following except
joja [24]
<span>C. a lack of political control or voice in government 
Hope this helps.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to socialist supporters, what impact did industrialization have on workers?
Dahasolnce [82]

Answer:

A. Instead of being dignified artisans, workers were now laborers for a boss

Explanation:

According to socialists, while industrialization brought enormous productivity and more wealth, it did not necessarily benefit workers.

Workers, who were artisans or farmers before, became subjugated to the capitalists, losing connection to their jobs, and becoming alienated.

4 0
3 years ago
Why is orange not are president and banana is
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

Thank y for the free points?

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Athena was all of the following except
Vilka [71]
She was not an aristocrat. She was a godess not a real person.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Anybody know the answers?
    9·1 answer
  • What assumptions did the United States make against Japan?
    15·1 answer
  • Which three statements describe economic or social factors that led to Latin American revolutions? Slaves in Haiti revolted agai
    7·2 answers
  • Philip II’s goal was to conquer Persia. Why did Alexander continue his campaign of conquest after this goal had been achieved?
    14·1 answer
  • Why were europeans less vulnerable to most diseases than native americans?
    7·2 answers
  • Where does the dalai currently live
    6·1 answer
  • The religious beliefs of these early African peoples was based on what type of ideology?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following distinguishes why large corporate farms are loosing favor with the public?
    15·1 answer
  • Some of the different kinds of entertainment that became available to the common family included _____. Select all that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • Why did Benedict Arnold decide to betray America in the Revolutionary War?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!