The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you forgot to attach the options for this question we can say the following.
According to John Locke, if the government fails to protect natural rights, the citizens could overthrow the government and establish a new one.
Here we are talking about the concept of popular sovereignty that originated in the times of the European Enlightenment and was included in the United States Constitution by the US founding fathers. They were directly influenced by the modern concepts on government and society introduced by brilliant philosophers and thinkers of the Enlightenment such as John Locke, Voltaire, Baron de Montesquiou, Jean-Jaques Rosseau, and Thomas Hobbes.
The solution reached by the Great Compromise was that:
1) The number of representatives from a state in the House of Representatives would be based on a states population.
2) Each state would have two Senators regardless of the states population.
Both elements of this agreement deal with the structure of Congress. Congress consists of the legislative branch of our federal government and plays an important role, as their main job is to develop laws for the entire country to follow. In this case, both states with small populations and large populations feel satisfied with the structure of Congress after the Great Compromise was passed.
religious differences and the promise of wealth
There are 538 total electors
The biggest difference between the Watergate Scandal and the Iran-Contra Affair is that the Watergate scandal was an internal politics problem, while the Iran-Contra Affair was a foreign politics problem. Both scandals were exposed by the media.
In the Watergate scandal, president Nixon was directly involved and exposed by the media as head of a group perpetrating illegal activities while it was never proved that President Reagan was directly related with the illegal aid to Contras and Iranian terrorist groups. So President Nixon was directly involved in the scandal.
The Watergate scandal was worse in my opinion because it is more famous and it was the only presidential impeachment in U.S. history, and that undermined the public image of american democracy.
