The most common justification of police officer corruption exists in the rotten-apple statement that the officer alone stands as deviant.
<h3>What are the responses about police misconduct?</h3>
The most common justification of police officer corruption exists in the rotten-apple statement that the officer alone stands as deviant. This argument extends to rotten bushels-groups of officials banding together to commit deviant actions.
Most often when we listen about police misconduct, it's due to instances of extreme use of force, brutality, lawlessness, coercive interrogations, witness tampering, or racial profiling. These actions can result in physical harm or death, wrongful imprisonment, and infringement of constitutional rights.
Incidents of unethical or criminal misconduct can influence the officer's capability to testify in both criminal and civil trials. In addition, such incidents may result in direct civil liability for the agency and may impact the agency's capability to protect itself in other, irrelevant civil trials.
To learn more about police misconduct refer to:
brainly.com/question/15022635
#SPJ9
Answer:
The correct answer is - Me.
Explanation:
In this incident, Tammy finds herself in her parent, guardian, or caregiver's eyes or perspective. It might be possible that she had a similar incident at some point there when Tammy took something without their permission from others and the caregiver scolded her.
According to Mead, ''ME'' is a part of self of the theory is, Tammy developed here.
Thus, the correct answer is - Me.
