Was it Ionia? That might be the answer
Matt and Linda both handle themselves well under pressure
I would disagree with the statement "United States vs. Nixon expanded the power of the presidency." In reality, it shrank the power of the president.
In this Supreme Court case, Richard Nixon refused to give up taped conversations he had from the Oval Office. Nixon claimed that this action was protected by the idea of "executive privilege." This meant that because he was president, he had the ability to keep these tapes from going to the courts. However the Supreme Court, in a unanimous vote, stated that the president must give up the tapes. This showed that no person was above the law, including the president. This shows that the presidents are responsible to the courts and do not have special protection in legal cases.
It was originally for discrimination purposes. In the early 20th century they blamed the Mexicans and used marijuana as a fear factor and put it on the Mexican Americans. Similar to the early drug epidemic. “Just say no” heroine was considered for blacks meth for whites and marijuana for Mexicans. This was all motivated by labeling.
Another reason was because the prohibition of alcohol once alcohol was allowed it was pressure that made people find a new drug to attack but they needed someone to blame essentially
They organized boycotts, marches, sit-ins, and worked to change laws.
