Answer:
decreased
Explanation:
As we know that there is a negative relationship between the rate of return i.e. required and the price of the stock. That means if the required rate of return rises, than the price of the stock reduced and vice versa
As in the given situation it is mentioned that the required rate of return increase so the price of the stock is decreased
The same is to be considered
I inferred you are to the 2017 TEDx talk "Short-termism is killing us: it's time for Long path" by Ari Wallach.
<u>Explanation:</u>
According to Wallach, he refers to short-termism as focusing on short-term results at the expense of long-term interests.
In his words, short-termism is a problem because;
- "it prevents the CEO from buying really expensive safety equipment"
- "prevents teachers from spending quality one-on-one time with their students".
So in summary what Wallach is saying is that short-termism prevents futuristic thinking.
Answer:
The beta coefficient for Stock L that is consistent with equilibrium
Explanation:
According to Capital Asset Pricing Model, the formula to compute expected rate of return is equals to
Expected rate of return = Risk free rate of return + Beta × (Market risk - risk free rate of return)
where,
rRF = risk free rate of return
rM = market risk
Stock L that is consistent with equilibrium is expected rate of return which equals to = 9.25%
So,
9.25% = 3.6% + Beta × (8.5% - 3.6%)
9.25% = 3.6% + 4.9% Beta
9.25% - 3.6% = 4.9% Beta
5.65% = 4.9% Beta
Beta = 5.65% ÷ 4.9% = 1.15
Hence, the beta coefficient for Stock L that is consistent with equilibrium is 1.15
