The correct answer is D) They cultivated the “three sisters” crops of corn, beans, and squash.
The two agricultural contributions that are common to both Northeast Woodland Indians and Southeast Indians are the following: they cultivated the “three sisters” crops of corn, beans, and squash.
The term "three sisters" in agriculture refers to the most important crops in the agriculture fields of some Native American tribes such as the Northeast Woodland Indians and Southeast Indians. The crops were corn, beans, and squash. The Native American Indians used a special agriculture technique called companion planting, that was the planting of different crops close to each other. So squash, corn, and beans were planted in proximity to each other.
I believe it's the example of <span>conservative ideology.</span><span>
conservative ideology tend to believe the power of the free market. According to this ideology, the Government interventions only reated imbalance in the market competitions, which only drives profit to the people who are not supposed to win the competition.</span>
Some theory argues that the Olmec civilization, had a dominant influence on the development of the Maya.
The development of the Olmec civilization, given after the period between 1500 and 1200 BC, occurred thanks to the improvement of these agricultural techniques, so they could overcome the hostilities of the environment and sustain large populations. From this development framework, the expansion of the occupied areas and the emergence of urban centers took place gradually.
San Lorenzo city began to decline, the city of La Venta became the most bustling center of Olmec culture. Until the fourth century BC, this city had great importance for such a civilization. After that, perhaps due to the action of great climatic transformations, this region was uninhabited until the definitive extinction of the Olmec people.
A major difference between the Christian church in western Europe versus eastern Europe in the period 500-1000 was B The church in western Europe was the main source of stability and order while in the East the church was part of a robust Byzantine government.
<h3>How did the Church in the West differ from the Church in the East?</h3>
After the Fall of Rome, the Church in the West was seen as a bacon of stability in a Europe that was divided in various nations and tribes who were constantly fighting each other and therefore causing all sorts of hardships for the people who lived there.
In the East however, this was not the case because the Byzantine empire was keeping order and stability. The Church therefore did not need to assume these roles and ended up being part of the empire.
Options for this question include:
- A The western church never allowed icons while the eastern church debated the issue.
- B The church in western Europe was the main source of stability and order while in the East the church was part of a robust Byzantine government.
- C The western church used the language of everyday speech in services while the eastern church used Latin.
- D The western church served one united political unit while the eastern church connected dozens of separate people groups.
Find out more on the Church in the East at brainly.com/question/617613
#SPJ1
