1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
storchak [24]
3 years ago
13

Samuel Adams, and his idea of state rights, was supported by the party of?

History
1 answer:
Afina-wow [57]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:the new nation

Those who did not support the Constitution came to be known as Anti-Federalists or ‘states-rights men’ and their most notable representative was Patrick Henry (who had refused to attend the Convention because of his suspicion of it, declaring “I smell a rat, tending toward monarchy

Others included George Clinton, Richard Henry Lee and Mercy Otis Warren, the female chronicler. Thomas Jefferson was also sharply critical of the Constitution, though he actively supported some parts of it, and later explained that he was not fully Anti-Federalist but somewhere between the two positions.

As a group, Anti-Federalists were concerned about several issues. They feared that sovereignty, autonomy and states’ rights would be trampled by the newly-empowered national government. They argued that over time the power and influence of the states would be eroded or ‘drained’ by the federal government. They worried that the centralisation of power would put control into the hands of an urban-based elite. They expressed concern that the president, with control of the army, might become a military dictator (“[the presidency] would be a foetus of monarchy!” said Edmund Randolph). They feared the separation of powers in the Constitution was not strong enough or distinct enough. They panicked about the possible implications for personal liberties like freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and the right to worship freely, which to many Americans had been the real driving issue behind the revolution.

A historian’s view:

“The basic concept stressed [in many anti-Federalist works] was the evil effect of power. ‘The love of power is natural… it is insatiable…’ wrote Burgh. ‘Power renders men wanton, insolent to others and fond of themselves,’ observed Gordon and Trenchard… This mistrust of power was characteristic of American political thought during this period.”

Unlike their opposition, the Anti-Federalists did not engage in a coordinated and sustained propaganda barrage. While the Federalist Papers appeared as 85 single editions, published regularly and with clear arguments and tone, the Anti-Federalists wrote sporadically, using pseudonyms such as Cato, Federal Farmer  Centinel and Brutus. The quality of their pamphlets did not approach those of the Federalists. Intellectually outgunned and lacking a figurehead leader such as Washington, the Anti-Federalists were not able to convince enough of their cause, though they enjoyed plenty of support, particularly in the larger states and in the south. Some Americans saw the flaws in both sides and supported neither the federalist or anti-federalist points-of-view. The picture above, The Looking Glass for 1787: A House Divided against itself cannot Stand, shows the two camps pulling the state of Connecticut apart with their constant bickering and equivocation.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which statement about Hitler's treatment of European Jews is correct? A. Hitler's persecution of the Jews led the United States
Alchen [17]
<span>Jews all over Europe were rounded up and sent to concentration camps to be murdered is the correct statement about Hitler's treatment of European Jews.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Henry Ford once said, "Competition is the keen cutting edge of business, always shaving away at costs." Based on this quote, whi
seropon [69]
The quote is  little undescriptive but i would say try C
8 0
3 years ago
Describe the effects of changing social, economic, and political conditions in the '20s and 30^​
Vinvika [58]

Answer:

The 1920s was a decade of profound social changes. The most obvious signs of change were the rise of a consumer-oriented economy and of mass entertainment, which helped to bring about a "revolution in morals and manners." Sexual mores, gender roles, hair styles, and dress all changed profoundly during the 1920s.

5 0
3 years ago
How did the events after the Revolution impact Native Americans?
Llana [10]

Answer:

In the long-term, the Revolution would also have significant effects on the lives of slaves and free blacks as well as the institution of slavery itself. It also affected Native Americans by opening up western settlement and creating governments hostile to their territorial claims.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
PLZ HELP! WILL MARK BRANLIEST! What was the result of the emphasis on the individual during the Renaissance?
mr_godi [17]
Creativity was the result of the emphasis
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Use the cause-and-effect chart to answer the question
    6·1 answer
  • According to carnegie, how has life improved for Americans?
    12·2 answers
  • What are the three mountain ranges nearest the Pacific coast
    6·2 answers
  • What was the American federation of labor? Who did it represent?
    12·1 answer
  • In which of the following regions has the United States been militarily involved, in the 1990s and into the early decades of the
    9·1 answer
  • What is the most likely reason Persia gave economic control to Russia and Britain?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the most common resource used during the 1st I.R.
    14·1 answer
  • What was the name of the first government in the United States?
    7·2 answers
  • The legislatures in three-fourths of the states can ratify an amendment.<br> O True<br> O False
    8·1 answer
  • Help me please i need this quiz done today
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!