To fight
...................
In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
Answer:
an increase in the number of women enrolling in professional schools. a significant increase in the number of women in the Senate. the end of the wage gap between men and women.
Explanation:
Answer:
B. Ukrainians
Explanation:
In Ukraine, you can still see the adverse effects, politically, of this. Many people in Ukraine still don't trust the Russian government.
Answer:
What does the law of conservation of matter state?
The Law of Conservation of Matter states that matter cannot be created or destroyed. In a physical change, substances can change form, but the total mass remains the same.
Explanation:
