The correct answer is B.
Clinton v. New York was a decision enacted by the US Supreme Court in 1998, which stated that the line-item veto violated the Presentment Clause and, therefore, the US Constitution.
The line-item veto had been introduced by the Line Item Veto Act in 1996 and it allowed the chief of the executive power, the President, to veto fragments or provisions of a bill without vetoing the entire bill. In opposition, the Presentment Clause describes the procedure through which bills originating in Congress, become federal US law. Such procedures only contemplate the president's power or rejecting an entire bill.
France<span> and </span>Germany.
Cuba<span> and the Netherlands.</span>
United States<span> and </span><span>Soviet Union</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
The Treaty of New Echota was a forced agreement between the cherokees and the federal government. Around 20,000 cherokees were marched by us troops and state militias to the Indian territory.
The march from the cherokees’s tribal homes to Indian territory was called the Trial of Tears.
: D) back then, the british were willing to invest money.
: how I know it’s D) is because, they were involved with wars back then. There was wars on British soil. They didn’t own a fleet of merchant ships. So the only one left would be D)!
hope this helps, let me know if you need anymore help with anything else! Please mark me brainliest haha if you can
The act of directing, ordering, or controlling by virtue of explicit statutory, regulatory, or delegated authority at the field level is referred to as "command," since this can be exercised at a variety of different power levels.
