Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
$845.83
Explanation:
The computation of the interest is shown below:
= Principal × rate of interest × number of days ÷ (total number of days in a year)
= $140,000 × 7.25% × (30 days ÷ 360 days)
= $845.83
Simply we applied the simple interest formula by multiplying the principal, interest rate and the time period so that it can arrive with the correct amount
Answer:
as taxes increase, there is a decrease in supply
Explanation:
Answer:
Dividend yield=10.3%
Explanation:
Mv=Do(1+g)/(Ke-g)
MV=?
Do=2.27
g=2.1%
Ke=14.56%
Mv=2.27(1+2.1%)/(14.56%-2.1%)
MV=2.75/(12.46%)
MV=$22.1
Dividend yield=dividend per share/share price per share
Dividend yield=2.27/22.1
Dividend yield=10.3%
Answer:
The employer will be held liable.
Explanation:
If the external agent brings harm or injury to a third party in the course of an employment, the employer is held liable. When a principal directs an agent to commit for a tort or if the principal is aware of the consequences of carrying the instructions of the agent could cause harm or injure the person, then the principal is liable.
It is called direct liability.
The liability for the intentional tort which is imputed to the principal when the agent acts to further the business of the principal.
The agent is personally liable under the following circumstances :
- Foreign principal
- Agent signs the contract in his own name
- Non-existent principal
- Principal cannot be sued:
- Undisclosed principal
Example :
A credit card company hires a sales person and offers a company van to make sales in that area. The sales person uses the office van to official purposes. But one night, he drove the car to a friend's party and while coming he drove over a pedestrian. In this case, the owner of the company will not be held liable as the sales person uses the company van for his personal use while going out for party with his friends. While causing the accident, the sales person was not not using the office van for official purposes and was not tendering official duties at that time.
