The answer you are looking for is number 3.
This is the most formal and accurate way to make your argument effective
All other ways do make your arguement more effective in a non-formal setting however
Rabbits are part of a food chain. I believe they are 1st level consumers. They eat producers. Other organisms who eat rabbits will have to search harder for other food. This can put higher organisms like 2nd or 3rd level consumers at risk of extinction.
Answer:
yes, what you wrote consider as a weaknesses. and not willing to except the others' opinion. and arguing with someone not willing to take my words or even believe me.
Explanation:
for example, when arguing about something that I don't know much about or i see just the good side of it.
Answer: D
Explanation: B and C are easy to rule out. B is easily ruled out because in the passage it doesn't come off with the tone that the couple is putting things away more than once <em>because</em> they're old. 'But keep putting on their clothes' nudges the reader toward, despite being old, the couple is still living life as they usually would when they were young. Making C ruled out easily as well.
Which leaves only A and D. This is where deciding which is right and which is wrong gets tricky. A is only ruled out because the question is <em>'Which of the following statements can be understood from the characterization in the </em><em>final two lines</em><em> of the passage?'</em>
1. Two who are mostly good.
2. Two who have lived their day,
3. But keep on putting on their clothes
4. And putting things away.
The question is asking for the last two lines. So the focus is on 3 and 4, not 1 and 2. 2 gives you the knowledge that the couple is old, but still isn't the focus of the passage. Line 3 shows that the couple is still doing things, and line 4 shows that they are finishing. So they're still living their life as anybody normally would, despite being old.