Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Read the passage, and highlight the words spoken by Mrs. Flowers. "I don't need to see the inside, Mrs. Henderson, I can tell . . ." But the dress was over my head and my arms were stuck in the sleeves. Momma said, "That'll do. See here, Sister Flowers, I French-seams around the armholes." Through the cloth film, I saw the shadow approach. "That makes it last longer. Children these days would bust out of sheet-metal clothes. They so rough." "That is a very good job, Mrs. Henderson. You should be proud. You can put your dress back on, Marguerite." —I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, Maya Angelou What inference can be made about Mrs. Flowers based on what she says to Mrs. Henderson? Mrs. Flowers is aware of how other people feel. Mrs. Flowers is not impressed by Mrs. Henderson’s work. Mrs. Flowers is interested in learning how to sew. Mrs. Flowers is jealous when other people are proud.
Answer:
Mrs. Flowers is aware of how other people feel.
Explanation:
By reading the text shown in the question above, we can see that Mrs. Flowers has a wit and sensitivity towards the feelings and emotions of the people around her. She is aware of how people feel, even if they don't say it, and she does it through observation and reasoning. This is very evident in the line "That is a very good job, Mrs. Henderson. You should be proud. You can put your dress back on, Marguerite."
The correct answer to which logical fallacy appears in the passage "If I let you turn in your assignment late, then you won't understand the importance of deadlines. Then you won't be able to get into college and get a good job" is when the speaker states the second sentence, following the previous one with the connector "then", which expresses continuity in time, <em>consequence, "after that"</em>. So, the reader can infer that the second sentence is a natural consequence of the first one, something that would happen subsequently naturally, which configures a logical fallacy.
A logical fallacy is <em>the wrong use of reasoning, a flaw in the structure of a deductive argument which invalids the argument.</em> A fallacy usually <em>seems better than it really is </em>and some of them are committed intentionally to manipulate. Fallacies <em>intend to mislead in order to make false inferences seem real.</em>
<em>Nothing can lead the speaker to deduct that if a person doesn't understand the importance of a deadline, it would be a following natural consequence that this same person would be unable to get into college or get a good job.</em> What would determine if a person is able to get into college are <em>several other skill parameters and circumstances</em>. Not understanding the importance of a deadline <em>doesn't lead one to fail the attempt of getting into college</em>, nor it determines if a person will or will not get a good job.
Answer:
Parents are a child's first teachers and role models” They are responsible for shaping up the child's behavior and implementing positive values in them. Children listen, observe and imitate their parents. ... Instilling and inculcatting good values in a child will in future make him/her a good person and a better citizen.
Explanation:
The correct answer is d. Mom and Dad spend their free time cycling and swimming.
Option a is not correct becuase CD players is plural but it is singular.
Option b is not correct because Kim and Rachel have different houses but this sentence "their" is used collectively.
Option c is not correct because members of the club could mean females or males. Her is specifically for females, but, grammatically, when we do not know the gender, we use his.
Option d is correct because Mom and Dad are together while spending this time. They are collectively cycling and swimming.
Hope this has helped you :)
Onomatopoeia? i hope it’s right i’m sorry if it isn’t the question is kinda weird
