<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the one having to do with the idea that they make people on welfare lazy and dependent on "government handouts", although this has been wildly discredited. </span></span>
William Wilberforce was inspired by his Christian faith to do humanitarian reforms and was a proponent for the abolition of the slave trade. With the help of some Christian, and politically involved friends they were able to push the Slave Trade Act. He also made some social reforms on working conditions.
<span>Mary Wollstonecraft was also an author of several civil rights writings and was very much of a feminist and an advocate for women's rights.
</span>
Both of them fought for the rights of people. They only differ in their focus.
D. Emperor Yulian’s death, without me you will die
Answer:
Great Britain encouraged Arab revolts against the Ottoman Empire as a way to weaken it during the First World War. It promised them independent kingdoms and was also interested in a trade relationship after the war. Sharif Hussein, who was the Emir of Mecca, was an Ottoman ally. But after learning Turkish plans to get rid of him after the war, he was disatisfied. He entered in contact with London through the famous agent T.E. Lawrence. In his exchanges with the British, he made it clear that he expected to be appointed the ruler of a new, large Arab state after the war.
Explanation:
