1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
TiliK225 [7]
3 years ago
8

At the time of the Missouri Compromise, there was conflict between the North and the South because of

History
2 answers:
elixir [45]3 years ago
7 0
At the time of the Missouri Compromise, there was conflict between the North and the South because of differences in regional economies.
ArbitrLikvidat [17]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is D: Differences in regional economies:

The United States was primarily agricultural in the years before , during and immediately after the civil war. About three quarters of the population lived in rural areas, including farms and small towns. Nevertheless, the Industrial Revolution that had hit England decades before , established itself in the "former colonies".

While factories were built in the North and South, the vast majority of industrial manufacturing was taking place in the north. The South had almost 25% of the country's free population , but only 10% of the country capital in 1860. The North had five times the number of factories as the South and over ten times the number of factory workers. 90% of the nation's skilled workers were in the North.

In the North, labor was expensive and workers were mobile and active. The influx of immigrants from Europe provided competition in the labor market.

Te South economy, however, was built on the labor of African slaves, who were oppressed into providing cheap labor.

A critical economic issue that divided the south and the north was that of tariffs. Tariffs were taxes placed on imported goods, the money from which would go to the government. Whenever the federal government wanted to raise tariffs, Southern Congressmen generally opposed it and Northern Congressmen  generally supported it . Southerners generally favored low tariffs because this kept the cost of imported goods low, which was important in the south's import- oriented economy.

In the North, however, high tariffs were viewed favorably  because such tariffs would make imported goods more expensive. That way, goods produced in the North would seem relatively cheap, and Americans would want to buy American goods instead of European items. Since tariffs would protect domestic industry from foreign competition.

Americans in the West were divided on the issue . In the Southwest, where cotton was primarily  a commodity , people generally promoted low tariffs . In the Northwest and parts of Kentucky, where hemp was a big crop , people supported high tariffs.

You might be interested in
How did the kansas nebraska act undo the missouri compromise?
ipn [44]
<span>How did kansas nebraska act undo the Missouri Compromise?<span>It allowed slavery to come into the North. I really enjoy doing research. If you</span></span>
8 0
3 years ago
What was the nickname given to sultan mehmed 11 of the Ottoman Empire and why?
Bogdan [553]

Answer:

Mehmed II commonly known as Mehmed the Conqueror (Turkish: Fatih Sultan Mehmet), was ... Full name. Sultan Mehmed Han bin Murad Han ... He is considered a hero in modern-day Turkey and parts of the wider Muslim world. ..... Demoralized, he escaped to Akkoyunlu territory where he was given a tımar (fief) in ...

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Who helped create the committees of correspondence to share ideas about the new british laws?
umka2103 [35]
Samuel Adams hepled establish the committee.
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the explains how the growth of the Mauryan Empire in such a short amount of time? A) The Mongols were finally defeated.
never [62]

<em>The correct answer is D</em>. Chandragupta Maurya was an able and skilled leader.

Chandragupta Maurya(340-298BCE) was the founder of the Mauryan Empire. He was the son of a Nanda prince and a noble member of the Kshatriya caste (the warrior-ruler caste). He wanted to eliminate in India the fragments of Macedonian influence.  

Kautilya Chanakya was the main advisor of Chandragupta when they formed an army, not so big and trained, but the brilliant strategies of Chanakya helped Chandragupta invaded Pataliputra and established the Mauryan Dynasty in 322. Chandragupta defeated the invaders from Greek and was considered a great leader with the support of its people.

Chandragupta dominance extended from Northern India until the Indus River and the Bay of Bengal in the East.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What three canals connected from the Great Lakes to the Ohio river?
bulgar [2K]

I think it's the Erie canal

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Describe the difference between the Assembly of the Centuries and the Assembly of the Tribes. Which assembly gave more control t
    6·2 answers
  • Who is the 16th president of the United states?
    12·1 answer
  • When did austria hungary declared war on serbia?
    10·1 answer
  • For most Latin American countries, the 1800s were the Era of __________.
    12·1 answer
  • What did it mean when the Dutch “kowtowed” to the Chinese emperor or his representatives?
    12·2 answers
  • How does the experience of fighting a war affect a
    5·1 answer
  • By allowing people to consult an attorney, the Patriot Act protects the rights in the
    7·1 answer
  • Do you know any creeps?!?!?! That just keep following you every where you go?????
    5·1 answer
  • Use the following chart about the Triangular Trade to answer the question:
    15·1 answer
  • Desperate, Will Mark Brainllest and Give Thanks for Correct Answer
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!