Answer:
According to Fishman, Wal-Marts business model effects suppliers, workers, and their communities. This occurs because the store was striving to keep their costs as low as possible. The idea of having the lowest costs quickly spread from the company to the suppliers because in order to provide the customers the lowest price the company has to be able to buy the goods at the lowest price. As the company grew in size, they worked to exhaust every method that could possibly save them pennies on materials, packaging, labor, transportation, and display. This became know as the "Wal-Mart effect"
This business model reflects the problems generally associated with globalization that are commonly cited by critics because it all depends on the manufacturers making and selling the cheapest products possible. These manufacturers are found all over the world which creates the global business model. Just like other models, if one part stops working as it is supposed to all the other parts would be affected, so if one countries production or overall revenue decreased than the whole world would be affected.
Explanation:
C he was a scientist who led the development of the atomic bomb
There is, however, another side to the question. The English stage was most flourishing in the time of Queen Elizabeth. The dramatists of that day looked upon amusement as only a part of their duties. Many men of lofty and penetrating intellect used the theatre as a medium for the expression of their thoughts and ideas.
Their aim was to ennoble and elevate the audience, and imbue it with their own philosophy, by presenting noble characters working out their destiny amid trials and temptations, and their pictures, being essentially true to nature, acted as powerful incentives to the cultivation of morality.
Shakespeare stands preeminent among them all, because by his wealth of inspiring thought he gives food for reflection to the wisest, and yet charms all by his wit and humour and exhibits for ridicule follies and absurdities of men.
It is a great testimony to the universality of his genius that, even in translations, he appeals to many thousands of those who frequent Indian theatres, and who differ so much in thought, customs and religion from the audiences for which he wrote.
