Answer: You have no problem speaking in the presence of large groups and you do this every weekend. You are very comfortable with it, but in class, you panic because OF THE ANXIETY PROVOKED BY THE CONTEXT OF YOUR SPEECH.
Explanation: Even though they might be the same audience, the platform has changed now, and may cause serious panicking.
Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
I most contexts, no. It can be considered an error if viewed from a programmer's perspective, because a bug is viewed as an error in the code of a program. If it is not viewed from a similar perspective, then it is not a synonym. Thesaurus.com can be a helpful place for you.
Answer:
I m not sure about the answer is right or wrong..
Explanation:
Near, Around, In, Next to, On
