Answer:
A. Inductive, weak, uncogent
Explanation:
- Correcty answer is Inductive, weak, uncogent, Because the inference claim is about gastrointestinal certainty, and about probability, it is an inspiration.
- This is a weak argument because the conclusion is not true if the premise is true. It is also an irrational argument because an argument must be strong in order to be strong.
<u>Answer:</u>
The topless towers of ilium were believed to be indestructible, but Helen led to their ruination, which parallels Faustus’s downfall. This line best explains the underlined image contributing to the meaning of the passage. The topless towers of ilium was allusion to the Helen of Troy. She was very beautiful however abducted paralleling the fall of Faustus due to his over ambitious and greedy nature. Similarities are drawn of the fall of Dr. Faustus and the topless tower of ilium.
<span>A. A live news feed on the television
This would be the most accurate and fastest. A newspaper article would not be a minute-to-minute basis neither would a blog. A radio show with a resident is not completely credible</span>
<span>The long, long train traveling to Canada, winding through the Rockies is fragment, I believe.</span>