1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kogti [31]
2 years ago
5

What did Marxist revolutionaries believe about workers?

History
1 answer:
mr Goodwill [35]2 years ago
7 0

The idea that a proletarian revolution is needed is a cornerstone of Marxism; Marxists believe that the workers of the world must unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class.

You might be interested in
In the space below, write a 500-word comparative essay evaluating the key similarities and differences between the world’s major
vodomira [7]

Form of government, political form, regime of government, political regime, system of government, political system, system of government, model of government or political model are some of the diverse ways of naming an essential concept of political science and the theory of State or constitutional right. It refers to the model of organization of constitutional power adopted by a State in terms of the relationship between the different powers. The way in which political power is structured to exercise its authority in the State, coordinating all the institutions that form it, makes each form of government requires regulatory mechanisms that are characteristic of it.

There are very different nomenclatures to denominate the different forms of government, from the theorists of Antiquity to the Contemporary Age; At present, three types of classifications are usually used:

• The elective character or not of the head of state defines a classification, between republics (elective) and monarchies (non-elective).

• The degree of freedom, pluralism and political participation defines another classification, between democratic, authoritarian and totalitarian systems, depending on whether they allow the exercise of discrepancy and political opposition to a greater or lesser degree or deny more or less radically the possibility of dissidence (establishing a single-party regime, or different types of exceptional regimes, such as dictatorships or military juntas); At the same time, the electoral system through which the popular will expresses itself in participatory systems has had very different historical configurations (direct democracy or assembly, indirect or representative democracy, census or restricted suffrage, universal male suffrage or of both sexes, different determinations of the age of majority, racial segregation, inclusion or not of immigrants, and others), as well as very different ways of altering or distorting it (borgo rotido, gerrymandering, electoral fraud, pucherazo).

• The existing relationship between the head of the State, the government and the parliament defines another classification, between presidentialisms and parliamentarisms (with many degrees or mixed forms between one and the other).

These three classifications are not exclusive, but complement each other, so that a republic can be democratic (United States or South Africa) or non-democratic (China or North Korea); a republican democracy can be parliamentary (Germany or India), semi-presidential (France or Russia) or presidential (Argentina or South Korea); and a monarchy can be democratic and parliamentary (Spain, United Kingdom or Japan), undemocratic (Saudi Arabia or Vatican City) or be placed in intermediate positions (Morocco), very usually qualified in a more or less anachronistic way with terms of the historical forms of the monarchy (feudal monarchy, authoritarian monarchy, absolute monarchy).

8 0
4 years ago
1 down deep narrow hole in the ground is used for protection<br><br><br><br><br> be my friend
Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

ok

Explanation:

........................

8 0
3 years ago
NEED ASAP I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST Why would punishments for breaking the law be different for corporations and individuals?
algol13

Answer: D, Individuals could not afford as large a fine as corporations could.

Explanation:

A and D are good answers but D is the one which is the most different between them. Individuals cannot afford to pay a large fine while corporations can. The U.S. justice system is more susceptible to heft a fine on corporations than average citizens.

7 0
3 years ago
If a writer wanted to introduce conflict in a scene without using an antagonist which would be most effective
Amanda [17]

Answer:

I would say maybe the author makes one of the main characters lose a shoe or falls on the ground and has to go to the hospital. as these things arnt people or animals so they won't be considered antagonists.

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes the scientific method
Zolol [24]
It was a new way to solve problems and do research.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The United States has fought in two wars against this oil rich country
    5·1 answer
  • What political issues divided alexander hamilton and thomas jefferson?
    6·2 answers
  • True or false: terrorism became an increasing concern during Bill Clinton's<br> presidency.
    8·1 answer
  • Thomas Jefferson is the one who wrote the draft of the Declaration of Independence.
    9·1 answer
  • Alexander hamilton published the federalist papers in an effort to
    15·1 answer
  • Which BEST describes where the election process begins? A) nominations B) party caucus C) local conventions D) voter registratio
    15·2 answers
  • ¿Cómo se estableció el sistema parlamentario en chile?
    6·1 answer
  • Name three things that Charlemagne did to unify his kingdom
    14·1 answer
  • How did the palace of versailles represent the ideals of absolutism?
    10·1 answer
  • How did John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson justify Jackson's seizure of Florida?<br> Ready?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!