The correct answer for this question is "All answers are correct." If a person living in West Africa was captured by a European slaver trader, the conditions that would the person face includes terrible treatment with almost no hope of freedom, brutal work in bad conditions and <span>a life far from home</span>
Explanation:
- The movement was essentially a peaceful and non-violent protest against the British government in India.
- Indians were asked to relinquish their titles and resign from nominated seats in the local bodies as a mark of protest.
- People were asked to resign from their government jobs.
- People were asked to withdraw their children from government-controlled or aided schools and colleges.
- People were asked to boycott foreign goods and use only Indian-made goods.
- People were asked to boycott the elections to the legislative councils.
- People were asked not to serve in the British army.
- It was also planned that if the above steps did not bring results, people would refuse to pay their taxes.
- The INC also demanded Swarajya or self-government.
- Only completely non-violent means would be employed to get the demands fulfilled.
- The non-cooperation movement was a decisive step in the independence movement because, for the first time, the INC was ready to forego constitutional means to achieve self-rule.
- Gandhiji had assured that Swaraj would be achieved in a year if this movement was continued to completion.
Hope this will help you..
<span>husband and wife
father and son
friend and friend
older and younger brother
ruler to subject</span>
Answer:
Hope I could help xxxxx ;P
Explanation:
Thomas Hutchinson was the last royal governor of Massachusetts Bay, a prominent loyalist, and a noted historian, both of his colony and his times. A native Bostonian, born September 9, 1711 to a wealthy merchant family, Hutchinson was, like many of his future political opponents, educated at Harvard University. In 1737 he was elected to the Massachusetts assembly, of which he was Speaker from 1746 to 1748. His support for an unpopular measure to redeem the colony's depreciated paper currency led to his defeat for re-election in 1749. He was then appointed to the Governor's Council and served as a delegate to the Albany Congress of 1754, where he joined Benjamin Franklin in drawing up a plan of American union. Hutchinson was made lieutenant governor of the province in 1758 and chief justice in 1760, offices he held simultaneously, much to the chagrin of Boston radicals such as James Otis (who believed he had been promised the latter post).
Many consider the French revolution as the being the spearhead of the modern politic.
* The revolution single handedly crushed the monarchical way of politics, the aristocratic domination up to that point in France, and church domination of French politics.
*The revolution furthermore abolished the feudal system and was one of the biggest steps towards modernity through out history.
*The revolution was a successful endeavour on the part of the French people because it reformed social tradition @and the hierarchy of France.
*Aristocracy by making all men equal and the enlightenment ideals which the revolution was based on came through to a great extent and in this way the French revolution was a success
