<span>The area was generally flat and good for growing crops. Settlers could travel upriver fairly easily, but only until they reached the fall line further travel upstream on the rivers was difficult from that point on.
Hope this helps :)</span>
The answer would be B !!!!
Answer:
because I think peace would make the world much a better place.
Answer:
Explanation:
Hindus believe that if they don't eat meat it minimizes hurting other life forms.
Nonviolence
The principle of nonviolence (ahimsa) applied to animals is connected with the intention to avoid negative karmic influences which result from violence. The suffering of all beings is believed to arise from craving and desire, conditioned by the karmic effects of both animal and human action. The violence of slaughtering animals for food, and its source in craving, reveal flesh eating as one mode in which humans enslave themselves to suffering.[19] Hinduism holds that such influences affect the person who permits the slaughter of an animal, the person who kills it, the person who cuts it up, the person who buys or sells meat, the person who cooks it, the person who serves it up, and the person who eats it. They must all be considered the slayers of the animal.[19] The question of religious duties towards the animals and of negative karma incurred from violence (himsa) against them is discussed in detail in Hindu scriptures and religious law books.
