1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kherson [118]
2 years ago
11

Please help with this will give brainiest 2 best answer

History
1 answer:
aev [14]2 years ago
6 0
The New England Colonies
You might be interested in
Which is the correct order of events that occured after Austria-hungary declared war on serbia?
Alex777 [14]

Answer:  Russia mobilized its forces, prompting Germany to declare a two-front war against Russia and France.


More details:

Various systems of alliances were put in place before World War I.  The two main alliance systems were the Triple Entente, which had Britain, France and Russia as allies, and the Triple Alliance, which had Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy as allies.  There were also other alliances, such as Russia taking on recently independent Serbia as an ally, as both had ethnic Slavic populations.

So here's how the start of World War I happened. When the Austrian prince and his wife were assassinated in Serbia, the Austrian government threatened the nation of Serbia with retaliatory action (even though the assassination was carried out by a terrorist group, not the Serbian government). Russia responded to Austria's threat, because Russia was bound to protect its Slavic ally, Serbia. Germany responded to the mobilization of Russian troops, and when Germany declared war on Russia in 1914, they implemented a military plan (the Schlieffen Plan), which assumed war would mean they'd have to take on all members of the Triple Entente alliance.  So as soon as Germany declared war on Russia, they sent troops to go attack France.  That pulled France and Britain into the war immediately as well, and the war spread and became a global conflict.

3 0
2 years ago
What was the relationship between Greek and roman culture ?
Elenna [48]
While both Greek and Romans were pretty ethnocentric by modern standards, the Romans assimilated far more people into their institutional lives.

Many non-Greeks adopted Gteek lifestyles, language and habits after the age of Alexander, but the cross-pollination was more frequently cultural than political. Cleopatra might have dressed like an Egyptian queen and patronized the Egyptian gods, but she wouldn't have had Egyptian generals or Egyptian judges. The Greeks tended to settle into the cultures they occupied like the British in India: remaining separate from and believing themselves superior to the people around them, even while encouraging the 'natives' to adopt their culture habits.

Romans did a much more thorough job assimilating the peoples they conquered. Non-Romans could and did become citizens, even from very early times. This started with neighboring groups like the Latins, but eventually extend to the rest of Italy and later to the whole empire. Eventually there would be "Roman" emperors of Syrian, British, Spanish, Gallic, Balkan, and North African descent Farther down the social scale the mixing was much more complete (enough to irritate many Roman traditionalists). This wasn’t just a practical accommodation, either — when emperor Claudius allowed Gauls into the Roman Senate he pointed out that by his time the Romans had been assimilating former enemies since the days of Aeneas.
7 0
3 years ago
BRAINLIESTTTTTT DUEEE
frosja888 [35]

Answer:

aaaaaaaaaa

Explanation:

aaaaaaaaaa

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List Thomas Paynes three major arguments and common sense
prohojiy [21]

Common Sense was an instant best-seller. Published in January 1776 in Philadelphia, nearly 120,000 copies were in circulation by April. Paine's brilliant arguments were straightforward. He argued for two main points: (1) independence from England and (2) the creation of a democratic republic. Paine avoided flowery prose. He wrote in the language of the people, often quoting the Bible in his arguments. Most people in America had a working knowledge of the Bible, so his arguments rang true. Paine was not religious, but he knew his readers were. King George was "the Pharaoh of England" and "the Royal Brute of Great Britain." He touched a nerve in the American countryside.

5 0
2 years ago
President Hoover was blamed for the economic meltdown, knowing what you know about the causes of the Great Depression...what att
EleoNora [17]

Answer:

Negative

Explanation:

The believed his policy and decisions were to blame

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A word that describes a person who is open minded and understands all the facts
    15·2 answers
  • Why did the French consider New Orleans to be strategically important for trade during the Columbian Exchange?
    8·2 answers
  • Describe the major characteristics of feudalism and manorialism
    6·1 answer
  • In the space below, construct a claim as to the effect the television has had on politics. Your claim should be at least 250 wor
    6·1 answer
  • Why were elective terms of office made purposely short, seldom more than one or two years​
    10·2 answers
  • It's also important to know what the elements of a citation represent. They often help you find the item, and are important for
    10·1 answer
  • Which event surrounding World War I had the GREATEST impact on Americans?
    11·2 answers
  • The following characteristics describe which United States region?
    11·1 answer
  • Do Yall Like The Warner Bros ''The Censored Eleven''
    8·2 answers
  • In response to the US invasion of Cambodia, congress
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!