Answer:
1-B.
2-D.
3-A.
4-D.
5-A.
Explanation:
I LOOKED ALL OF THESE UP SO THEY ARE RIGHT!!!!!
Answer:
After many years of often violent riots, or protests, the end of apartheid began in the early 1990s, culminating with the formation of a democratic South African government in 1994. The end of apartheid can be credited to the combined efforts of the South African people and governments of the world community, including the United States.
Please sum it up and put it in your own words, have an awesome day!
I dont think so but it depends on who you are and your thoughts on it.
Answer:
A) a negative emotion or a negative state or arousal
Explanation:
In psychology, cognitive dissonance happens when a person holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values, or participates in an action that goes against one of these, either his believes, ideas or values, and experiences psychological stress because of that. According to this theory, when two actions or ideas are not consistent with each other, people do all in their power to change them until they become consistent psychologically.
The discomfort is triggered by the person's belief clashing with new information perceived, wherein they try to find a way to resolve the contradiction to reduce their discomfort.
Feeling uncomfortable when one act in a way that is against his or her believe and hence stress themselves over the actions is cognitive dissonance.
Answer:
The Supreme Court case known as Kelo v. City of New London was controversial because it allowed greater use of the power of eminent domain.
Explanation:
Kelo v. City of New London is a judgment of the US Supreme Court on whether the government can expropriating private property and transferring it to another private entity, with the purpose of economic development of the city. The plaintiff, Kelo, was the resident of the requisitioned land, and the defendant was the municipality of New London, Connecticut. On June 23, 2005, the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court on this case attracted wide attention. This case involved a “paid collection” of land. According to the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court, local municipalities have the power to impose private land for commercial development – as long as such development falls within the category of “public use”. The Supreme Court ruled that “the city’s planned deployment of land acquisition is in line with 'public use' and within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment clause.” Therefore, the case also triggered a new round of discussions on how to implement the Fifth Amendment, how to explain it, and how to use it.
