Radicalism played a significant role in the Civil Rights movement. In terms of setbacks, the views of some individuals in society made it difficult for the goals of the civil rights movement to be accomplished. For example, citizens who were in favor of segregated schools made it difficult for African-Americans to get access to an equal education. Even after the Brown vs. Board case stated that separate but equal was not legal, schools still fought to keep African-Americans out of schools that were all white.
Even though radicalism played a negative part, the views of these individuals also helped progress the Civil Rights movement in other cases. The radicals who used violence against African-American citizens who were practicing nonviolent protests received negative attention from the media. After seeing several stories where African-Americans were physically abused by individuals with radical views, American citizens started to turn against these people hurting others who were trying to be peaceful.
Answer:
B) take a job outside the home to supplement the family’s disposable income.
Explanation:
In the eastern part of the confederacy, the Army of the Protomac met with mixed success. The Union Army failed to capture Richmond and won at Antietam only because the Confederates withdrew from the field first. In the western part of the Confederacy, the Army of the West won the Battle of Shiloh, and the Union navy captured New Orleans and Memphis.
Basically as the banking system was in its nascent stages in Italian cities, such as Florence, there was the rise of a centralized wealthy urban class. Certain families such as the Medici rose to the fore. Their wealth dictated the frescoes and artworks in many parts of the cities in which they resided. They often competed to commission works of artists and underwrite the lives of such folk.
<span>
As time went by these families grew to control such other worldwide operations as the Church of Rome.</span>
Answer:
hesitant
Explanation:
Opponents of ratification were called Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists feared the power of the national government and believed state legislatures, with which they had more contact, could better protect their freedoms. they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights
