1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kifflom [539]
3 years ago
14

The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object

the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
What is the best explanation of this quote from the Declaration of Independence?
A.
The colonists have tried to seek solutions from the king for their problems, but he has ignored them each time.
B.
The oppression of the colonists has been so great that they could not send their petitions to the king.
C.
The king has significantly abused the colonists' rights many times over a long period of time.
D.
The petitions to the king about problems in the colonies have been poorly written and caused more harm.
History
1 answer:
svet-max [94.6K]3 years ago
3 0
I would say C because the king did repeatedly abuse our rights. Like the intolerable acts for instance shut down the port of massachusetts and hurt trade. Also the quartering act the sugar act the stamp act and a few more that evntually led us to civil war with him. We peacefully sent the king a olive tree branch petition which was supposed to be a sign of peace. But he rejected it and called us in full rebellion. So we fought for ourselves and won the civil war and made friends with britain as our main trade partner.
You might be interested in
What makes the Churchill war of speech inspirational
Brut [27]

Answer: Hi here what I think.

Churchill war of speech was really inspirational. To understand Britain was in a very difficult time. Churchill refused to surrender Britain to the Nazi that inspired the country. His speech gave people hope that they could win when they were losing very badly.

I hope this helps:)

6 0
3 years ago
Please help me! <br><br>How are electromagnets, generators, and motors different?​
Firdavs [7]

Answer:

A generator converts mechanical energy into electrical energy, while a motor does the opposite - it converts electrical energy into mechanical energy. Both devices work because of electromagnetic induction, which is when a voltage is induced by a changing magnetic field.

AC motors convert electrical energy into that of mechanical. ... Most AC motors produce the current by using induction. An electromagnet causes the magnetic field and uses the same voltage as the coils do.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

- Eijiro <3

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Guys I need help with the chart!!!!-_-
Bogdan [553]

United States

The two super powers had very different ideas of how Europe should be rebuilt. The United States naturally wanted Europe to be rebuilt along Democratic-Capitalist lines, while the Soviet Union, being a communist country, wanted Europe to be rebuilt along Marxist lines.

Soviet Union

The goal of the Soviet Union during the Cold War was to keep control of Eastern Europe, and to spread communism around the world.

According to the programme, "the main goals and guidelines of the CPSU's international policy" included ensuring favorable external conditions conducive to building communism in the Soviet Union; eliminating the threat of world war; disarmament; strengthening the world socialist system; developing equal and friendly .

The leaders of the Allies were Franklin Roosevelt (the United States), Winston Churchill (Great Britain), and Joseph Stalin (the Soviet Union). The common purpose of the Allies was to defeat the Axis powers and create a peaceful post-war world.

I hope I can help you :)

4 0
3 years ago
wich quacker leader faced realigious persucation in england and founded a haven for quackers in north america
Jobisdone [24]
<span>William Penn was the Quacker Leader</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Does the anti-imperialist league believe abraham lincoln would have supported –the annexation of the philippines? explain.
marin [14]
<span>Abraham Lincoln onced stated no man is good enough to govern another man without that other's consent. When the white man governs himself, that is self-government, but when he governs himself and also governs another man, that is more than self-government-that is despotism. Therefore the Anti-Imperialist League did not believe that Lincoln would have supported the Annexation of the Phillippines.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Explain why King thinks the tension stirred up by his protest movement promotes social and political reform.
    15·1 answer
  • What was one significant result of the war of 1812
    14·2 answers
  • How can archaeological information based in pseudoscience be recognized.
    11·1 answer
  • 1. What crazy thing happened at Jackson’s inauguration reception at the White House?
    10·1 answer
  • What is 48782756 written in Word form
    6·2 answers
  • What symbol did the Mayan use for zero? what symbol did they use for one and five?
    11·1 answer
  • What did the Burmese and Vietnamese independence movements have in common?
    10·1 answer
  • Which best paraphrases this paragraph?
    12·2 answers
  • What does the columbus map tell you. i need help asap lol
    7·1 answer
  • What would the world be like without books?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!