Pericles' famous Funeral Oration, recorded by historian Thucydides in his book History of the Peloponnesian War (431 BC - 404 BC) , was delivered at the end of 431 BC as part of an annual public funeral for the war dead.
In his seech he broke away from tradition by skipping the military achievements of the city-state and dwelling on the city's cultural and academic qualities, its government system, its freedoms and the character of the athenian citizen. In the fourth paragraph he states:
<em>"Further, we provide plenty of means for the mind to refresh itself from business. We celebrate games and sacrifices all the year round, and the elegance of our private establishments forms a daily source of pleasure and helps to banish the spleen; while the magnitude of our city draws the produce of the world into our harbour, so that to the Athenian the fruits of other countries are as familiar a luxury as those of his own." </em>
We may indeed conclude that the content and direction of his speech gives an indication of his and his culture's appreciation for the citizen and his liberties, the city's vibrant cultural atmostphere and its cosmopolitan attitude, drawing these conclusions from the arguments he presents.
Answer:
<h2>A) the freedom of press guaranteed by the First Amendment. </h2>
Explanation:
"Watergate" refers to efforts by persons working for President Nixon's reelection campaign to spy on their opponents at Democratic party headquarters, and subsequent efforts to cover up those crimes.
An insider at the FBI who remained anonymous at the time, known only as "Deep Throat," began to give information concerning Watergate to reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of the <em>Washington Post.</em> Persistent investigative reporting by Woodward and Bernstein brought the scandal to light and forced Congressional hearings. The freedom of the press played a central role in the road to the impeachment of President Nixon.
Answer:union declared victory
Explanation: I study a levels history
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The significance of having three branches of government is tremendous and can't be overemphasized. Some of the significance includes:
1. It makes the government effective and efficient.
2. Having three branches of government protects the rights of the citizens
3. It prevents arbitrary use of power by the government
Are there advantages if the responsibility to govern is shouldered only by one branch?
No there are no advantages. If any branch of government turned has all the power of the executive, judiciary, and legislative there will eventually be an arbitrary use of power in the long run, and this will affect the citizens and that society at large. This has been proven in human history in the past in the case of the dictator and absolute monarchy.
I wanna say it is <span>Joseph Unahue, I'm not positive though.
</span>
