Answer:
<em> </em>
<em>State power is widely thought to be coercive. The view that governments must wield force or that their power is necessarily coercive is widespread in contemporary political thought. John Rawls is representative in claiming that (political power is always coercive power backed up by the government(s use of sanctions, for government alone has the authority to use force in upholding its laws.( This belief in the centrality of coercion and force plays an important but not well appreciated role in contemporary political thought. I wish to challenge this belief and the considerations that motivate it. States are not necessarily coercive or coercive (by definition.( Their claimed authority is prior to the force they wield. Legitimate states should need to resort to coercion and force much less than other states, and that fact seems unappreciated in contemporary political thought.Explanation:</em>
<em>Carry</em><em> </em><em>on</em><em> </em><em>learning</em>
The boy finds the girl and follows them
But I can hear it now :if teenager are all so safe, why do they have such high accident rate
Answer:
sabotage
Explanation:
<em>Connotation </em>refers to the ideas and emotions that a word arouses apart from its literal or primary meaning. Thus, the noun <em>sabotage </em>means to destroy or incapacitate for military or political purposes, so it evokes negative feelings of disruption and vandalism.
The rest of the words are incorrect because a <em>premise </em>is a hypothesis or argument, <em>utilities </em>have to do with productiveness and advantages, and <em>defense </em>deals wih protection and resistance.
Answer:
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
the riony is that he built a statue to show how strong and mighty he was, yet his statue now is destroyed and shattered to peices.
Explanation:
hope this helps. if you need more tell me
