The testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests is:
- The reason for this is that the prior events serve as impermissible character evidence.
<h3>What is irrelevant evidence?</h3>
Irrelevant evidence is the type of evidence that does not apply to the issue at hand and can cause a distortion of the facts.
In the case of the police officer in question, the evidence that he wants to present will cause confusion about the issues and possibly mislead the jury.
Learn more about irrelevant evidence here:
brainly.com/question/1865742
#SPJ1
Complete question:
A man has sued a police officer, alleging that the officer violated the man's civil rights by using excessive force while arresting him. At trial, the officer admits to having hit the man in the head with the butt of his gun but contends that the force was necessary because the man was resisting arrest. In support of his contention, the officer seeks to introduce evidence that the man had resisted arrest on three prior occasions during the last 10 years.
Is this testimony regarding the man’s conduct during the three prior arrests admissible?
There are different reasons that can make a statement to be true. When the king called for a meeting of the estates-general, the commoners of the third estate demanded more power and formed a national assembly is a true statement.
<h3>Why is a
true statement?</h3>
- If you view the text, you will see that the there was a royal plots against them and as such the people of Paris had to arm themselves.
Due to the hungry and hard living conditions, the move of the king to send troops to Paris was known to be a key factor and also the final point that angered the people.
This made them to attacked the Bastille, and brought about the beginning of the French Revolution.
Learn more about true statement from
brainly.com/question/1821869
The only graph that shows a proportion relationship is the line that crosses the origin point (0,0)
This sentence should not be included because it is not explained why these organizations have a negative perspective.
<h3>What is paragraph 2 about?</h3>
Paragraph 2 focuses on the positive points or the benefits of vegetarianism. This idea is stated in "Many studies have found that vegetarianism has important health benefits".
<h3>Should the sentence be included?</h3>
The sentence presented states some health organizations have created a negative perspective about being vegetarian. This idea is indirectly related to the benefits of being vegetarian.
Moreover, this idea is not completely explained, for example, there are no reasons why these organizations have this perspective. Based on this, the sentence should not be included.
Note: This question is incomplete because the text has not been provided; here is the missing section:
(3) Many studies have found that vegetarianism has important health benefits. (4) For example, a vegetarian diet is connected to lower rates of heart disease and diabetes as well as lower cholesterol levels. (5) Some studies have also shown that cancer rates are lower in vegetarians than in meat-eaters and that vegetarians tend to live longer than nonvegetarians.
Learn more about perspective in: brainly.com/question/457192
you need to have more than that for your question