Answer:
Explanation:
They both are right especially during the time of their presidency. Thomas Jefferson believed that a strong federal government proved itself to be a necessity although he probably didn't like the idea at all. After all the founding fathers tried the Articles of Confederation (ratified 1781) and found out that it didn't really work.
Eight years later, they wrote the constitution that we currently live under. The federal government was given a lot more power which it needed. That doesn't mean it was fully embraced. Just that it was the next step. If anything, for all Jefferson's idealism, he was a pragmatist. If it worked, do it and be content.
====================
Lincoln saw the whole situation quite differently. The Civil War began with the underlying cause of state's rights. Later on (1863), Lincoln turned to the question of slavery. There was a hole even in the 1789 Constitution and that hole came back to haunt everyone. The question was individual rights. Slaves. The south could not easily survive without slave labor and because slaves were expensive, they were more or less humanely treated. After the Civil War, their condition was a nightmare. Lincoln address the entire question of what was missing in the constitution although he did not bring any amendments to correct what he knew had to be corrected. He may have done so if he was not murdered. As it was it was left to Johnson to bring in the 13th amendment, which abolished slavery.
An original criticism is that Kantian ethics is said to be doomed to be nothing or empty and also rigidly same in terms of its prescriptions and it is one where the complaints cannot be seen as true.
<h3>What is the good thing according to Kant?</h3>
We need to look into them on equal moral ground based on the will that is behind their actions.
The only thing that is good and one that is without qualification is said to be good will and that was what Kant says and this is what i agree with.
Hence, An original criticism is that Kantian ethics is said to be doomed to be nothing or empty and also rigidly same in terms of its prescriptions and it is one where the complaints cannot be seen as true.
Learn more about criticism from
brainly.com/question/2947946
#SPJ1
The primary purpose of the genealogies of 1 Chronicles 1–9 is to construct a monument to the pre-exilic dead of Judah and Israel, reflecting the important cultural value Judeans placed on the preservation of one's name after death.
A polyatomic ion is a group of atoms bond by covalent bonds with an unbalanced charge. A binary ionic compound is composed of atoms of two elements bond by an ionic bond.
