6.

Law

1 answer:

rodikova [14]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

option a is the correct option

You might be interested in

Question 6

OleMash [197]

Answer:

what is a gender based violence

7 0

1 year ago

A Supreme Court justice who agrees with the majority in a case, but disagrees in whole

igomit [66]

Answer:

concurring

Explanation:

a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different or additional reasons as the basis for their decision.

3 0

2 years ago

A golfer tees off without seeing his partner has stopped his cart in front of the Teebox with his cart his partner gets hit with

Airida [17]

Answer:

If it wasn't intentional and also apologized for it then there can be another way of solving the eye problem

4 0

2 years ago

From the following, please choose which branch of government may have made the following examples of law, and whether each would

Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

An agreement between Mexico, Canada and USA would be made by the Executive because it's the President who sings this kind of agreements.
The Compassionate Use would be legislative because the FDA needs to approve and the are autorized to make laws.
The necessity of giving the Miranda Warning to persons being arrested, it's Judicial because is the "reading" of their rights.
An ordinance making it illegal to plant Mulberry trees, would be made by a Local.
The right to abortion, would be made by a Judicial power because that would mean that it won't be penalized.

Explanation:

It'd be a Federal law.
It'd be a Federal law.
It'd be a Federal law.
It'd be local because there is no Federal or State law who bans such tree.
It'd be a State law. [Each state has the power to decide over this]

6 0

3 years ago

It is usually most slippery

Marysya12 [62]

I think is A but am not sure

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers