Change the following sentences into active or passive form.

which is the best translation of the dialect in the excerpt? "ah, i hear you crying again. you shouldn’t do that. we will make t

gavmur [86]

“Ah, your wife is crying again. There is no need for that. We said we were good thieves.” this is the best translation of the dialect in the excerpt. Thus, option B is correct.

<h3>What is an excerpt? </h3>

An excerpt can be defined as a small paragraph that can be taken from a book, novel, poem, or even an article that describes what the person is intending to tell or show the readers about the message.

In this passage which is taken from “Civil Peace” which is written by Chinua Achebe. the thief is trying to say that there will be no harm done to the family and that they are good thieves.

Also trying to tell the husband to make sure that the wife should not cry as they are there for their possessions only and will not harm them. they also told the wife to stop crying. Therefore, option B is the correct option.

Learn more about an excerpt, here:

brainly.com/question/3141228

#SPJ4

The correct question will be:

Read the excerpt from “Civil Peace” by Chinua Achebe.

"Ah, missisi de cry again. No need for dat. We done talk say we na good tief." Which is the best translation of the dialect in the excerpt?

“Ah, I hear you crying again. You shouldn’t do that. We will make the thieves go away.”

“Ah, your wife is crying again. There is no need for that. We said we were good thieves.”

“Ah, your kids are crying again. There is no need for that. We will make the thieves go away.”

“Ah, your wife is crying again. We will call the other thieves over here if she doesn’t stop.”

4 0

1 year ago

What is love, and how does it change us?

antiseptic1488 [7]

Answer

when you're with someone who makes you feel that loved and happy, happiness exudes from your aura. Love changes us. It can bring us to some very dark places in our life, but it can also lead us onto an even better path. When I've fallen in love, it's always been this overwhelming feeling of bliss and freedom.

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Arrange the events from the poem “The Raven” by Edgar Allan Poe in the correct order.

Ostrovityanka [42]

1. The speaker is in his chamber late at night reading old books.

2. The speaker starts feeling drowsy when he hears a tapping at the window.

3. The speaker comforts himself into believing that the tapping sound is a visitor who has come to see him.

4. The speaker is surprised to find no one when he opens his door.

5. The speaker gets even more frightened when the curtains rustle.

6. The speaker hears a noise at the window and a raven flies in.

7. The speaker whispers the name "Lenore", and he hears the same name echoed back.

8 0

2 years ago

Who is the first human in the world?

Ivenika [448]

Answer:

Adam (religiously)

or Lucy (scientifically; there wasn't really a first human, but if you had to come up with someone, this is what might be considered correct, as it is the earliest remains)

Explanation:

religiously [Judaism/Christianity], the first person is believed to be Adam, created by G*d.

scientifically (based on fossil records and theories of evolution), there was no first "human", or, at least, not in the way you're thinking of.

people, like all other organisms, have evolved from a very distant ancestor. This is called a common ancestor, and it is theorized to be shared by all organisms/life on earth [not the same as plants]. However, this ancestor is not even remotely human, it was likely no more than a worm-like creature.

Over time, different versions of this animal started evolving, and eventually, a species (which began to resemble humans as we see them now). Early Australopithecus would probably be the first "humans"--although, they were not really humans. These were in existence 1-5 <em>million</em><em> </em>years ago. (This is when religion does not line up with science--we have fossil remains of Australopithecus, and they are not nearly what Adam is described as from a religious perspective, there is literally no possible way for a human to have been that evolved the same amount of time ago-

**This is why I believe that religious texts are theoretical, and were never written to be facts, they were stories that helped people understand morals. I am somewhat religious)

I digress. So, over time, these old distant versions of humans, that were really, really, different from humans evolved. This is why there is no <em>first </em>human, we evolved together.

One of the earliest recorded "humans" was Lucy, an Australopithecus. We don't believe her to be the first human scientifically, because there could be no first human--our existence <em>is </em>evolution, and there is no start to human history--it begins from a place that was not humans.

So, there was no first human, only the earliest recordings of one (which is what we often simplify to be the first human)

8 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Is this the correct answer

Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago