Of the opening sentences that were presented here that strongly engages the reader and provides context to them would be the second one which is "We could have had a worse weekend, but it's awfully hard to beat Bigfoot and bugs."
The first and third one were just not good enough because it exposes the rest of the context to the reader and lets them have the idea of what you are talking about which usually leads to the readers not choosing to continue to read, thus taking out the reader's engagement but still provides context. The last one is better than the first and third, but it spilled the beans when it mentioned the particulars as to what made the weekend bad to worse. The answer is just right. It has the impact that would hook the reader to know more about your weekend and why is Bigfoot and bugs together in your statement. The rain wasn't mentioned which would be ideal to make the story telling take a turn to much worse which would spike up the interest of the reader.
An example of parallelism in rhetoric in the speech "I have a dream": "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In language structure, parallelism, otherwise called equal structure or equal development, is an equalization inside at least one sentences of comparable expressions or statements that have the equivalent syntactic structure. The use of parallelism influences intelligibility and may make writings simpler to process.
It makes a huge impact on the passage or the part of the literature where ever it is used. The most important impact is that it creates simplicity and reduces the complexity in the text which makes it easier for the reader to grab the idea of the text.
Mercantilism was a form of economy used by British citizens to make money be selling exports to enrich their motherland.
Its the spread of disease from one person to another but it dose no have to be a disease
