1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Amiraneli [1.4K]
3 years ago
15

A rat in the house may eat the ice cream

English
2 answers:
Ne4ueva [31]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

the icecream might eaten by a rat in the house

lana [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The icecream might be eaten by a rat in the house.

Explanation:

Maybe it's active to passive voice? Anyways, if so, the answer is above^…^

You might be interested in
HURRY! EXPERTS/ACE PLZ HELP QUICK!! ( only 5 short questions "multiple choice" ) also i need a good grade so no guessing plz:)
gladu [14]
Question 1: A
Question 2: C
Question 3: A
Question 4: B
Question 5: C

Hope this helps!
4 0
3 years ago
Is violence ever justified? argumentative essay​
djverab [1.8K]

Answer:

Violence is a central concept for describing social relationships among humans, a concept loaded with ethical and political significance. In some, probably most, circumstances it is evident that violence is unjust; but, some cases appear more debatable to someone’s eyes: can violence ever be justified?

As Self-Defense

The most plausible justification of violence is when it is perpetrated in return of other violence. If a person punches you in the face and seems intentions to keep doing so, it may seem justified to try and respond to the physical violence.

It is important to notice that violence may come in different forms, including psychological violence and ​verbal violence. In its mildest form, the argument in favor of violence as self-defense claims that to violence of some sort, an equally violent response may be justified. Thus, for instance, to a punch you may be legitimate to respond with a punch; yet, to mobbing (a form of psychological, verbal violence, and institutional), you are not justified in replying with a punch (a form of physical violence).

In a more audacious version of the justification of violence in the name of self-defense, violence of any kind may be justified in reply to the violence of any other kind, provided there is a somewhat fair use of the violence exercised in self-defense. Thus, it may even be appropriate to respond to mobbing by using physical violence, provided the violence does not exceed that which seems a fair payoff, sufficient to ensure self-defense.

An even more audacious version of the justification of violence in the name of self-defense has it that the sole possibility that in the future violence will be perpetrated against you, gives you sufficient reason to exercise violence against the possible offender. While this scenario occurs repeatedly in everyday life, it is certainly the more difficult one to justify: How do you know, after all, that an offense would follow?

Violence and Just War

What we have just discussed at the level of individuals can be held also for the relationships between States. A State may be justified to respond violently to a violent attack – be it physical, psychological, or verbal violence to be at stake. Equally, according to some, it may be justifiable to respond with physical violence to some legal or institutional violence. Suppose, for instance, that State S1 imposes an embargo over another State S2 so that inhabitants of the latter will experience tremendous inflation, scarcity of primary goods, and consequent civil depression. While one may argue that S1 did not impart physical violence over S2, it seems that S2 may have some reasons for a physical reaction to S2.

Matters concerning the justification of war have been discussed at length in the history of Western philosophy, and beyond. While some have repeatedly supported a pacifist perspective, other author stressed that on some occasions it is unavoidable to wage wars against some offender.

Idealistic vs. Realistic Ethics

Explanation:

built diff

5 0
1 year ago
The paper in this book was once part of a tree is this a sentence of a fragment
astraxan [27]
Not sure I understand what you're asking?

3 0
3 years ago
What does the author mean by the phrase whip our own top? A) to believe in ourselves B) to think ourselves great Eliminate C) to
Verdich [7]
I think it's E but i'm not sure.
5 0
3 years ago
Why might Jacobs have chosen to begin with an overview of mrs roosevelts life
Katena32 [7]
Pesquise no google amiguu
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which sentence includes an infinitive used as a direct object?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following sentences uses "their" correctly?
    5·2 answers
  • How did the cat walk
    5·1 answer
  • How does the informal style help you better understand
    6·1 answer
  • Why is the books title picture book ?
    9·2 answers
  • How would you write " i saw zombies! Chris cried "
    7·2 answers
  • Explain what paragraph 10 and paragraph 11 contribute to the overall structure of the story. Cite evidence from the text in your
    13·1 answer
  • Please help! 20 points for whoever gets this right...
    9·2 answers
  • Word Wednesday ( post a word y’all think is weird)<br> For example I think class is a weird word
    14·1 answer
  • I got an 85 on an english quiz, and im not sure how to tell my parents. What should i do. Ill mark whoever gives a valid answer
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!