Jihad is a struggle or fight against the enemies of Islam.
Terrorism is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives” (28 C.F.R.
Answer:
All I know is the 3rd question of part 2 which is The union won and abolished slavery.
Explanation:
Answer:
I dont know if this is an optional choice question if so this is probabaly wrong on the ABCD scale so you can report this but otherwise if not:
People make up there mind with the knowledge of there own opinions and what <em>is</em><em> </em>factual to them so to change there minds is because it is based on other peoples opinions and this makes sense ( the easiest way to explain it is as if its a filter going through this persons brain and them identifying if this is factual to them or not in <em>their</em> opinion) to them so, after they go through this process of <em>proving</em> this other information that they held so kindly to there truth, <em>wrong</em> this suddenly changes there mind. By what they think is factual enough to believe <em>at least to them. </em><em>It</em><em> </em><em>can</em><em> </em><em>be</em><em> </em><em>diffe</em><em>rent</em><em> </em><em>for</em><em> </em><em>everyone</em><em> </em><em>else</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
Casualty rates at the Battle of Okinawa and Iwo Jima plays a small role in the justification of dropping the atomic bomb, and is by no means the only justification or even the major justification in using the atomic bomb. They were, after all, only used as a statistical report through the casualty per sq. mile report of what can occur when invading the mainland. So yes, it may be a means towards the justification, but as the justification itself it is not.
~
B. States are always represented by two senators, regardless of the size of their population.
