Answer:the last seemingly identical war, between the same principal opponents (France and Germany), took only five months, not counting a siege of Paris that extended the actual peace settlement another 5 months. It appeared that with modern, increasingly lethal weaponry, plus railroads for efficient movement, victory in Europe would be quick and complete, though it was less clear who would be that victory.
Explanation:
<span>Motives for Exploration - Wealth and Religion. The motives for Spanish, French and English explorers were all different, although in some ways, they were the same. They all wanted to find the Northwest Passage, which they believed was a direct and efficient route to the Orient - home of spices, silks and wealth.</span>
The climate, environment, land and natural resources that were available to the Indian tribes in this area, located in the very center of North America, resulted in the adoption of the culture shared by the Great Plains<span> Indians.
</span>
The correct statement is "forbade European intervention in the Western Hemisphere."
The Monroe Doctrine was aimed at separating the world into the Eastern and Western Hemispheres. In this case, the US did not want any European influence in the Western part of the world, especially in the Latin American countries. The US argued that these countries, such as Brazil, Chile, and Bolivia, were under the "sphere of influence" from the US.
Even though the US did not want European countries to interfere with countries in this hemisphere, they had no intention of taking over any colonies established before this doctrine. This meant that the Europeans who already controlled areas in the Western Hemisphere did not have to worry about a US invasion of any sort.
Northern: No slaves, mostly republican (our democrat) ideas, economy was based on trade and business
Southern: Slavery was supported, mostly (our idea of) republican, their economy was based on plantations and slaves
Hope this helps! Please let me know if I'm wrong or missed something. :)
