The correct answer to this open question is the following.
There is no question here. It is just a statement.
However, doing some research we can say that the proper question for this statement is the following: <em>"Is Mark's service in a jury a responsibility or an obligation?"</em>
If that is the case, then the correct answer is "an obligation."
According to the laws of the state, an individual who is summoned by the state to be part of a jury has the obligation to attend. If he or she does not attend, he should be fined according to the law. If the individual cannot attend, it has to be for a very important situation that has to be explained. Otherwise, the state will consider his +/her negativity to attend as a contempt of court.
Answer:
yes I agree with the statement that the unification campaign of prithvi Narayan shah proved that the success can be gained by the diplomatic fitness not only by the physical strength because he think that it is the success of all up us .
Lincoln hated popular sovereignty because it was used to have power over slaves. It was intended to support the people from having their slaves and bringing them to different places that they wanted without any restrictions. It ties the slaves to an obligation of having a master. It was a confused principle used to justify slavery.
