The correct answer to this question is "omniscient third-person." The point of view that is used in the passage is <span>omniscient third-person. </span>Omniscient third-person is, ostensibly, a bit more freeing, because you aren't limited to a single character's perspective.
The answer to the question above is "B) regeneration of a forest is dependent on the germination of acorns and hickory nuts" which best explains how irony is used in the passage according to the passage above. The passage above explains the acorn and hickory nuts devouring action by the overpopulation of squirrels<span>. It is a fact that a forest needs the germination process. This process increases the ability of a forest to regenerate.</span>
B. Great mistake.
Hope that helps :)
The correct answer is B. Since it's a small town, everyone knows everybody else.
Explanation:
In this specific story, the setting includes details such as "Country field" or "small town" because these details refer to the context and specific location of this story including the geographic and demographic features "The population barely reached 263 people". Moreover, this specific setting affects the story because it affects the characters. Indeed, this specific stetting implies in the town there are few people and they know and support each other. This is explicitly mentioned in "Everybody knew everybody". According to this, the correct answer is B.
Answer:
The correct answer is D.
Working against the natural tendencies of the environment leads to long-term consequences.
Explanation:
In the first paragraph, the theme of green literature is evidenced when the writer references the damage to New York City's topography due to the need to build deep underground subways that double as bomb shelters.
In the second passage, the imagery used by the writer gives a clearer picture of the damage that was done to the environment.
In the first passage, the potential hazard arises because sewer lines have to be pumped uphill with subways below them.
If there is an earthquake, for instance, the entire structure comes crashing down.
In the second passage, the damage was already done, leaving Norwegians with the problem of how to create soils upon which plant fauna could thrive. Had they, managed the tree population by planting more than they were cutting, they probably would have avoided the "<em>green problem".</em>
Cheers
