The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
<span>This is a major job hazard that come with the profession of policing. Stress is mostly prevalent for men during their afternoon and night shifts because thats is when they are mostly isolated and may face the highest hazard associated with the job as the job most often involve chasing criminals in dangerous neighbourhood, carry around a weapon that can lead to the lead of another, the monotony of the job or even the societal taboo that the police men are corrupt most often lead to stress in the life of a police officer.</span>
When he goes skating with Tami he will most likely remember how to skate due to his "childhood" memory
